Strauss-Kahn lawyers meet with prosecutors to discuss future of sexual assaut case

Lawyers from both the prosecution and the defense are meeting today to discuss the sexual assault charges against Dominque Strauss-Kahn.  It is possible that the case could be dismissed by the end of this week.

If the case is ultimately dismissed, it appears that Strauss-Kahn’s problems will continue.  French author, Tristane Banon, who claims Strauss-Kahn tried to rape her during a book interview in 2003 says her attorney has filed a criminal complaint with the Paris prosecutor’s office.

Strauss-Kahn has described the alleged 2003 book interview incident as “imaginary.”

Breaking News: Casey Anthony found Not Guilty of 1st Degree Murder

After deliberating for a day and a half the jury of 7 women and 5 men has found Casey Anthony not guilty of the murder of her 2 year old child Caylee Anthony.

Casey Anthony – Not Guilty Verdict

The final verdict was as follows:

  • Count 1:  1st Degree Murder – Not Guilty
  • Count 2:  Aggravated Child Abuse – Not Guilty
  • Count 3:  Aggravated Manslaughter of a Child – Not Guilty
  • Count 4:  Providing False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer – Guilty
  • Count 5:  Providing False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer – Guilty
  • Count 6:  Providing False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer – Guilty
  • Count 7:  Providing False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer – Guilty

Providing False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer is a 1st degree misdemeanor punishable by 1 year in jail.  See Florida Statutes §837.055.  Sentencing is set for Thursday at 9 am.  Casey Anthony will likely receive credit for the time she has served and be released from custody.  She has already served 3 years pending her trial.

 

Jury selection begins tomorrow in the criminal trial against baseball legend Roger Clemens

Roger Clemens is set to begin jury selection on Wednesday in his trial in Federal Court in Washington D.C.  He is charged with six counts including perjury and obstruction and faces 21 months under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines if convicted.  He has vigorously denied ever using any illegal substances.

The two key witnesses against Clemens are his ex-trainer Brian McNamee and former New York Yankees pitching phenom Andy Pettitte.

Brian McNamee has claimed that he injected Clemens with Steroids and Human Growth Hormone (HGH) numerous times from 1998 to 2001.  McNamee also provided prosecutors with used syringes and bloodied gauze that he claims he kept for the past 10 years just in case Clemens ever turned on him.  He told congressional investigators that he kept the syringes and gauze, “because throughout my time with Roger Clemens … I distrusted him to a degree. I just felt that, if I was going down, I wasn’t going to go down alone because I never felt good about this.”

Andy Pettitte will testify that in 1999 or 2000, he had a conversation with Roger Clemens in which Clemens told him that he had taken human growth hormone.   This information was provided in an affidavit that Pettitte prepared for congressional investigators.  Clemens has said that Pettitte mis-remembered their conversation and that the actual conversation was about the use of HGH by Clemens’ wife, Debbie.

Clemens has said that the only injections that he ever received from Namee were shots of  the pain reliever lidocaine and vitamin B-12.  In a deposition before congressional investigators, Clemens stated, “I have never smoked a cigarette, I have never smoked dope, I have never done cocaine. I would not put anything — allow anybody to put anything in my body that’s going to be harmful to me.  That’s who I am as a person.”

The trial will undoubtedly affect Clemens’ future baseball legacy including possible entry to the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame.  Known as “The Rocket”, he finished his amazing 23 year career with 354 wins, an ERA of 3.12 and 4,672 strikeouts.  He was also an 11 time All Star selection, 7 time Cy Young award winner and winner of 2 World Series Championships.

 

Criminal Law Update

Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexual assault case is falling apart for the Government

Strauss-Kahn is the former IMF leader (and French future presidential candidate) who was charged with attempting to rape a maid in his $3,000 per night hotel suite in New York City on May 14,2011.

According to numerous published reports, the sexual assault case against the former IMF leader is very near collapse.  There will be a court hearing today, July 1, to determine whether there will be a change in Strauss-Kahn’s bond as he is presently on house arrest in New York.  It is also possible that the charges could be dismissed.

Numerous new revelations about his alleged accuser have surfaced that will make it nearly impossible for the Prosecution to move ahead with a case.

Some noted revelations:

  • When the accuser came to the United States for Guinea, she alleged that she had been raped in her native country on her political asylum application.  She has since admitted that this was a lie.
  • Prosecutors have discovered possible links between the accuser and criminal activities which include money laundering and drug dealing.
  • The accuser had a recorded telephone conversation with an incarcerated man where she discussed the potential benefits of bringing a case against Strauss-Kahn.
  • Over the past two years, the incarcerated man, as well as numerous other individuals, have deposited over $100,000 into the accuser’s bank account.

It appears that it will be very likely that this case will be ultimately be dismissed.  It is certainly headed in that direction.

UPDATE:  Strauss-Kahn was released from house arrest today.  He is now free  to come and go as he pleases in New York and his $6 million dollar bond has been returned.  As of now, he will not be returned his passport to allow international travel back to France.

 

Defense Rests in Casey Anthony Trial, will not call her to the stand

The defense finished their case in the Casey Anthony trial without calling the her as a witness.  Earlier in the week, the defense asked to have Ms. Anthony evaluated for competency.  This may or may not have been due to a desire by her to testify.  After reviewing the evaluating doctor’s reports, the Judge found Ms. Anthony to be competent and the trial continued.

 

There are certainly times where it is a good idea for a defendant to testify on their own behalf.  This case definitely is not one of those times.  Casey Anthony has told far too many outrageous stories since this investigation began to risk putting her on the stand.  The prosecution would likely have destroyed any credibility Ms. Anthony has left if she had taken the stand.

The prosecution will put on a brief rebuttal case today and closing arguments could begin as early as Saturday.

 

Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich found guilty on 17 counts including trying to sell or trade President Obama’s old Senate seat

msnbc.com staff and news service reports

CHICAGO — A jury has found former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich guilty on 17 corruption-related charges, including trying to sell or trade President Barack Obama’s old Senate seat.

Blagojevich had faced 20 charges, including the Senate seat allegation and that he schemed to shake down executives for campaign donations. He was convicted on all charges regarding the Senate seat.

The jurors delivered their verdicts Monday after deliberating nine days.

Blagojevich testified for seven days, denying wrongdoing.

According to Chicago Tribune reporter Stacy St. Clair, Blagojevich turned to his wife Patti and whispered “I love you” after the verdict was read. Patti kept shaking her head and remained seated as the jury exited the trial room.

Prosecutors said he lied and the proof was on FBI wiretaps. Those included a widely parodied clip in which Blagojevich calls the Senate opportunity “f—— golden.”

Blagojevich was in court for the verdict.

Jurors in his first trial deadlocked on all but one charge, convicting Blagojevich of lying to the FBI.

Blagojevich already faces up to five years for the lying conviction.

Deadlock at first trial
Jurors at the first trial came back deadlocked after deliberating for 14 days. They agreed on just one of 24 counts, convicting Blagojevich of lying to the FBI.

Despite that, hung juries are rare. According to one federal study, using data from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, just 2.5 percent of federal trials from 1980 to 1997 ended hung — a lower rate than for juries in state courts.

When jurors do deadlock, it is often at trials where the charges are complex and where the evidence appears ambiguous, a 2002 federally funded study by The National Center for State Courts found.

“You have both in the Blagojevich case — complexity and evidence that’s not straightforward,” said Gal Pissetzky, a Chicago defense attorney who tries cases in federal court.

Prosecutors almost certainly factored that in going into the retrial. They streamlined the case by dropping racketeering counts against the ex-governor and dismissing all charges against his then co-defendant brother, Robert Blagojevich.

And at the retrial, they presented just three weeks of evidence — half the time taken at the first trial. They called fewer witnesses, asked fewer questions and played shorter excerpts of FBI wiretaps that underpin most of the charges.

There was also a new variable at the retrial: Testimony from Blagojevich himself. At the first trial, the defense rested without calling any witnesses and Blagojevich didn’t testify despite vowing that he would.

But retrial jurors saw a deferential Blagojevich look them in the eyes and deny each and every allegation, telling them his talk on the recordings was mere brainstorming. This time, jurors must decide if they believe him.

The article on the MSNBC website can be seen here.

Cops Lose Burglary Suspect, Find Grow House

By Brian Hamacher
NBCMIAMI.com

 

A SWAT standoff in Miami-Dade ended Monday night with no one in custody but police didn’t walk away completely empty handed when they found a marijuana grow house inside the home they’d surrounded.

The standoff began around 2 p.m. when officers went to a home on Southwest 69th Avenue near 38th Street looking for a man in connection with a residential burglary.

Officers saw a man run into the home, and police surrounded the home. But when the standoff ended, and police entered the home, they were unable to find the man.

However they did find what Miami-Dade Police described as a “fully operational clandestine marijuana hydroponics laboratory” with 18 mature pot plants.

Police are still investigating and are looking for the suspect.

The article on the MSNBC website can be seen here.

Drug Trafficking – Minimum Mandatory Sentences

Drug Trafficking cases in Florida come with very serious minimum mandatory penalties.  A minimum mandatory sentence means that, if convicted, the Judge may sentence the defendant to no less than the minimum mandatory sentence.  This is true even if the sentencing guidelines are far below the minimum mandatory sentence.

Whenever I am retained by a new client who has been charged with drug trafficking, many are shocked to hear the enormous potential penalties that they are facing.  Many people associate drug trafficking with scenes from the movie Scarface or from the old Miami Vice TV show.  In Florida, whether or not you face a drug trafficking charge comes down to one very important factor… weight.  (although Cannabis uses the total number of plants as an alternative)  It doesn’t matter if you drive a Ferrari or live in a Penthouse on Biscayne Bay in Miami.  You don’t have to have a secret rendezvous where drugs are exchanged for suitcases full of cash.  If you merely possessed a listed amount of a drug outlined in Florida Statute §893.135 then you may be charged with trafficking and face serious minimum mandatory sentences.  It is that simple.

To outline some (but not all) specific drugs and their minimum mandatory amounts, see below:

  1. Cannabis (Marijuana)
    • 25+ pounds but less than 2,000 pounds (or 300 or more plants) = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 2,000+ pounds but less than 10,000 pounds (or 2,000 or more plants) = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 10,000+ pounds = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.
  2. Cocaine
    • 28 grams to 200 grams = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 200 grams to 400 grams = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 400 grams to 150 kilograms = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 150+ kilograms = life sentence.
  3. Oxycodone, Hydrocodine, Morphine, Opium and Hydromorphone
    • 4 grams to 14 grams = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 14 grams to 28 grams = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 28 grams to 30 kilograms = 25 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 30+ kilograms = life sentence.
  4. Phencyclidine (PCP or Angel Dust)
    • 28 grams to 200 grams = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 200 grams to 400 grams = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 400+ grams = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.
  5. Methaqualone (Quaalude)
    • 200 grams to 5 kilograms = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 5 kilograms to 25 kilograms = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 25+ kilograms = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.
  6. Amphetamine and Methamphetamine (Crystal Meth)
    • 14 grams to 28 grams = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 28 grams to 200 grams = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 200+ grams = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.
  7. Flunitrazepam (Date Rape Drug)
    • 4 grams to 14 grams = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 14 grams to 28 grams = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 28 grams to 30 kilograms = 25 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 30+ kilograms = life sentence.
  8. GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyric acid), GBL (gamma-butyrolactone) and 1,4-Butanediol
    • 1 kilogram to 5 kilograms = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 5 kilograms to 10 kilograms = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 10+ kilograms = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.
  9. LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide)
    • 1 grams to 5 grams = 3 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 5 grams to 7 grams = 7 year minimum mandatory sentence.
    • 7+ grams = 15 year minimum mandatory sentence.

See  Florida Statute §893.135

If you have been arrested for Trafficking in Drugs then please contact our office as soon as possible to set up a free consultation.  There are many possible defenses to these cases.

 

 

Boating Under the Influence (BUI)

A recent USA Today article on boating under the influence shows that numerous states are stepping up enforcement.  In addition, the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators is pushing for a national marine field sobriety test standard that would enable patrol officers to test boaters while they’re seated.

See video here: States crack down on drunken boaters.

Here are points from the different states noted in the article:

  • Oklahoma has lowered it’s legal blood alcohol level from .10% to .08%.
  • Iowa will reduce their legal blood alcohol level from .10% to .08% beginning July 1, 2011.
  • North Carolina has stepped up their enforcement on both driving and boating under the influence.
  • Texas has the police working hand-in-hand with Judges to expedite warrants to draw blood from suspected impaired boaters.
  • New York will no longer treat impaired boaters as first time offenders if they have had a prior DUI.

In Florida, Boating Under the Influence (BUI) has always been aggressively enforced by the Florida Marine Patrol.

Boating Under the Influence is covered under Florida Statute §327.35.  It carries many of the same penalties as DUI in Florida with a few exceptions.

 

Conflict of Interest?

Often, two people are arrested together while engaged in what is perceived as a criminal act by the police.

When they come to see me, they often assume that because two persons were arrested, they will need two separate attorneys to represent them.  Sometimes this is correct but this is not always the case.  In fact, there are many situations where having the same attorney will clearly benefit both defendants.

Rule 4-1.7 addresses what disclosure must be made to the clients in order to represent them both in the same criminal case.

The Rule points out that:

(a) Representing Adverse Interests. A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client will be directly adverse to the interests of another client, unless:

(1) the lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not adversely affect the lawyer’s responsibilities to and relationship with the other client; and

(2) each client consents after consultation.

(b) Duty to Avoid Limitation on Independent Professional Judgment. A lawyer shall not represent a client if the lawyer’s exercise of independent professional judgment in the representation of that client may be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client or to a third person or by the lawyer’s own interest, unless:

(1) the lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not be adversely affected; and

(2) the client consents after consultation.

(c) Explanation to Clients. When representation of multiple clients in a single matter is undertaken, the consultation shall include explanation of the implications of the common representation and the advantages and risks involved.

Do I Really Need to Hire a Criminal Defense Lawyer?

The State Attorney announced in court that they would not put me in jail if convicted so I don’t need a lawyer!

Although this is wonderful news, this does not mean that a conviction will not affect you for the rest of your life. A single conviction may keep you from getting your dream job, keep you out of certain social clubs or deny you of membership in homeowner’s associations when purchasing or renting a home. If convicted of a Felony you would also lose your right to vote and carry a firearm.

It’s only a Misdemeanor.

A misdemeanor crime is punishable by a jail sentence and/or probation. 364 days for a first degree misdemeanor and 60 days for a second degree misdemeanor.

 

I can use the Assistant Public Defender for free and save some $.

Let me start by saying that there are many excellent Public Defender’s out there… With that said, PD’s are overworked and underpaid. They often have a hundred or more open cases in addition to in-court duty and other concerns. You also don’t get to choose which PD will represent you. By hiring the right private attorney, you will get the individual attention that most Public Defender’s simply can not provide. The right private attorney will have the time and attention that will make the difficult time a client faces while being prosecuted much smoother. They can constantly keep the client informed of developments, meet with family, develop theories of defense and be available for all questions/concerns that the client may have. *** I am not promoting that all private attorney’s are better suited to help you. Some private attorneys take too many cases, are completely unprepared and/or do not spend nearly enough time working to resolve matters for their clients.

 

It’s my first DUI – It will just be a slap on the wrist.

DUI penalties throughout the United States have become particularly severe. This is definitely the case in Florida where we have some of the toughest DUI laws in the nation. The hiring of a lawyer can save you from a conviction which may cost you thousands of dollars in fines and court costs, numerous hours taking classes and receiving alcohol treatment, additional time spent performing community service hours, mandatory impounding of your vehicle and the potential to have a required embarrassing interlock device installed on your vehicle. DUI is treated very seriously by the courts and has some of the toughest lobbyists in the nation with Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) constantly pushing the legislature for even tougher laws against violators.